has anyone else seen this install error?
kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Mar 6 20:54:05 PST 2004
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 10:50:50PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> This is something that someone has bound to have seen and
> fixed already. It seems to be a difference in installs
> that happened around 5.2, that affects the way the symlink
> to the shared object library is done. (The port in this
> example is devel/tcl-neo).
> The port makefile and distfile are identical, but on
> 4.9 it succeeds with:
> ln -fs libneo82.so.1 /usr/local/lib/libneo82.so
> and on 5.2 it fails with:
> ln -fs /usr/local/lib/libneo82.so.1 /usr/lib/libneo82.so
> (Note "/usr/lib", not "/usr/local/lib".)
> Any hints?
There were bsd.lib.mk changes that exposed brokenness in a lot of the
tcl-related makefiles, which seem to have a common source. A number
of others were fixed late last year, but I don't remember more
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040306/b0bfbeaa/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports