Hye-Shik Chang wrote:
> Aah, Right. How about this, then?:
>
> [...]
Looks good to me. An unrelated comment, but since we are at it: How
about testing ${PYTHON_NO_DEPENDS:U} instead of ${PYTHON_NO_DEPENDS},
and erroring out when it's not "NO" or "YES" (e.g. "TRUE")?
-Oliver