okay to .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.java.mk"?

[Sergey Matveychuk]

Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> I have a different approach in PR 64233: pre-include options when
> available. A bsd.port.options.mk would just be a hack working around
> the many deficiencies of OPTIONS. IMHO OPTIONS should be deprecated
> and replaced by something better. I would like to see a graphical
> configuration tool, but OPTIONS is just badly designed and hard to
> support, so it causes more problems than it solves.

Does it means your PR/64233 is not appropriate?

---
Sem.