Change to INDEX format
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Sun Jun 20 00:33:18 GMT 2004
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 20:05, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:13:46AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > On 2004.06.18 19:17:00 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list
> > > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping
> > > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS. I need a version of this in
> > > order to support recent changes to the package build cluster, which
> > > adds the dependencies separately before the corresponding build stage,
> > > to test for errors that would be seen on a clean system.
> > Do you have a sample new INDEX somewhere? I would like to test the
> > web scripts, just to be sure, but INDEX building fails when I try at
> > the moment (could be I have messed something up since I don't normally
> > build INDEX myself).
> Here's a sample INDEX-5:
I like this idea a lot.
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040619/b5020cee/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports