PORTDOCS in the Porter's Handbook
sem at ciam.ru
Sat Jun 19 22:30:38 GMT 2004
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Frankly, such a thought crossed my mind, too. But in order to make
> a statement that will stand for ages, we must decide here first what
> is the status of the old and new ways for package listing doc files.
> Possible choices include:
> a) either of them may be used at porter's option;
> b) the old way is documented so that the audience can see
> how legacy ports work, but porters are encouraged to use the
> new way, PORTDOCS, when creating or updating ports;
I think b) will be more preferably. But portmgr@ should give an approvement.
More information about the freebsd-ports