NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE set together?

[Clement Laforet]

On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 18:24:40 +0400
Yar Tikhiy <yar at comp.chem.msu.su> wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> Is it all right to set both NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for a port
> to indicate that mirroring the original distfiles is the only thing
> allowed by the license?

AFAIK, NO_PACKAGE implies NO_CDROM.
Use:
NO_PACKAGES: when you can't distribute a binary and/or a modified
             version
NO_CDROM:    when commercial-related distribution is prohibited
RESTRICTED:  when we can't mirror the distfile and more, or you're unsure
             about the license

clem
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040604/10e54b5c/attachment.bin