NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE set together?

[Alex Dupre]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yar Tikhiy wrote:

| Is it all right to set both NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for a port
| to indicate that mirroring the original distfiles is the only thing
| allowed by the license?

Yes.

| The comments at the top of bsd.port.mk, and the Porter's Handbook
| seem to imply that these variables are mutually exclusive.

I personally reworded that paragraph in the Porter's Handbook to be much
more clear. And I read in the first note: "NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM are
independent and can be set simultaneously."
So I don't know how you can say that the handbook seems to imply they
are mutually exclusive :-)

- --
Alex Dupre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAwIjCgRXp2M5fVU0RAlRjAKDpiC/dkNMRU/DmOJ/neKRIQ6I/TACgzRrl
kzIXCFPDV2CTwvoboPOXESY=
=32Nu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----