NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE set together?
ale at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jun 4 14:36:38 GMT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
| Is it all right to set both NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for a port
| to indicate that mirroring the original distfiles is the only thing
| allowed by the license?
| The comments at the top of bsd.port.mk, and the Porter's Handbook
| seem to imply that these variables are mutually exclusive.
I personally reworded that paragraph in the Porter's Handbook to be much
more clear. And I read in the first note: "NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM are
independent and can be set simultaneously."
So I don't know how you can say that the handbook seems to imply they
are mutually exclusive :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-ports