configuring ports via Makefile.local

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at
Fri Jul 30 12:13:58 PDT 2004

On Friday 30 July 2004 20:47, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:

> Please NO! OPTIONS are very ugly, IMHO. Imagine installing a new system
> and running a massive portinstall. The only real solutions IMHO are the
> make.conf approach

It's funny how people always critisize OPTIONS for just the wrong reasons. 
Installing a new system or running a massive portinstall is no problem - just 
set BATCH and you'll be fine. And if you already know what OPTIONS you want, 
additionally set them in make.conf as usual and you'll be fine, too.

   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     |
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list