configuring ports via Makefile.local
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Fri Jul 30 12:13:58 PDT 2004
On Friday 30 July 2004 20:47, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Please NO! OPTIONS are very ugly, IMHO. Imagine installing a new system
> and running a massive portinstall. The only real solutions IMHO are the
> make.conf approach
It's funny how people always critisize OPTIONS for just the wrong reasons.
Installing a new system or running a massive portinstall is no problem - just
set BATCH and you'll be fine. And if you already know what OPTIONS you want,
additionally set them in make.conf as usual and you'll be fine, too.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040730/c2abfd56/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports