Packages with Absurd Dependencies
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Thu Jul 1 09:13:54 PDT 2004
On Thursday 01 July 2004 17:43, Jeffrey Katcher wrote:
> I appreciate your response, and apologize for my somewhat overdramatic
> posting. I know I have more control via ports, but it's the prebuilt
> packages with dependencies that are most troublesome. I can understand
> libxml2, even, but gtk2? There should be another class of dependency for
> "could use" instead of "must use"...
There has been a long thread about this topic just recently. Search the
archives of this list for a thread "A question about dependencies".
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040701/a5645e79/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports