HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jan 20 10:07:06 PST 2004
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 13:02, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:29:55PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >
> > I agree. This approach seems the most flexible. As for not being able
> > to do non-root installs, this is a bogus argument as one could simply
> > override PORT_DBDIR as they would PKG_DBDIR (even with the original
> > patch).
> >
>
> I was taking about non-root builds, e.g. single ports checked out
> outside of PKGBASE to do maintenance work, not non-root installs. In
> an environment where non-root installs are done your argument is valid.
> Not being able to do non-root builds compilcates the job of maintainers.
As I said, non-root builds could override PORT_DBDIR the same way you
could override PKG_DBDIR. You could point that to a directory to which
you could write. What am I missing?
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus at FreeBSD.org
gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040120/36bfe6cb/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list