HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes

Sergei Kolobov sergei at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jan 20 07:12:45 PST 2004

On 2004-01-20 at 17:58 +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> >Sorry for stepping up so late, but this saves options under
> > ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/options
> >
> >Lots of ports have the same PORTNAME (ie 'openldap' for
> >net/openldap2[012]-(client|server), 'apache' for russian/apache13,
> >www/apache(13|13-fp|2|21)). Some conflict, but -client/-server don't.
> >Either each port has to set OPTIONSFILE to 
> >${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/something,
> >or we may use LATEST_LINK instead of PORTNAME:
> Why don't you think we could use ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PKGNAME} instead?
> PKGNAME has no conflicts.

Because PKGNAME include version number, and you probably want to keep
the same options for a next version of the same port, right?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040120/b63f6727/attachment.bin

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list