FreeBSD Port: samba*
David W. Chapman Jr.
dwcjr at inethouston.net
Mon Feb 23 12:43:26 PST 2004
These are issues that need to be brought up to the samba team. I'm working
on updating to 3.0.2 now which may fix some of your problems.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Jakubik" <mike at afirma.ca>
To: "'Timur I. Bakeyev'" <timur at com.bat.ru>; <dwcjr at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: <ports at FreeBSD.org>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: samba*
> I see. I ran the 3.0.x branch and I've found it to be stable for the most
> part, however character conversion (needed to setup file sharing for Macs)
> did not work, and neither did the vfs modules I needed. Hope the issues
> resolved soon.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timur I. Bakeyev [mailto:timur at com.bat.ru]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:42 AM
> To: Mike Jakubik; dwcjr at FreeBSD.org
> Cc: ports at FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba*
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:12:18 -0500
> "Mike Jakubik" <mike at afirma.ca> wrote:
> > I am just wondering, but shouldn't samba be moved to samba-old and
> >samba-devel to samba? It is my understanding that the latest stable
> >code is 3.0.2a, and the 2.2 branch is only getting security updates.
> Well, 3.0 branch isn't yet 'stable' in the FreeBSD sence, at least. If you
> take a look on a samba roadmap, they expect stability only in the 3.x
> of samba. Samba 3 is still for brave ones or for those who need new
> badly :)
More information about the freebsd-ports