www/flashpluginwrapper
Brandon D. Valentine
brandon at dvalentine.com
Wed Feb 18 16:31:32 PST 2004
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:47:48AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (02.18.2004 @ 0858 PST): Norikatsu Shigemura said, in 1.1K: <<
> > I will not remove flashpluginwrapper. But I think that anyone
> > doesn't want to use this port. Because it was upgrade to
> > linuxpluginwrapper. Of cause, I know many people who is using
> > non-libmap.conf(5) feature's environment. So I'm keeping it.
>
> On systems on which linuxflashplugin will work out-of-the-box (i.e. 5.X,
> 4.X after a week ago), I think flashpluginwrapper should still be marked
> IGNORE, and should instruct people to use linuxflashplugin.
My suggestion would be to add a conditional to the port Makefile like
this:
.if ${OSVERSION} < 490102
IGNORE= "Please use www/linuxpluginwrapper. This port should be obsolete. If you wish to use this port anyway, set NO_IGNORE."
.endif
HTH,
Brandon D. Valentine
--
brandon at dvalentine.com http://www.geekpunk.net
Pseudo-Random Googlism: winter is camellia season
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list