www/flashpluginwrapper

Jeremy Messenger mezz7 at cox.net
Wed Feb 18 10:27:00 PST 2004


On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:15:02 -0500, Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin at gmx.net> 
wrote:

> On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500
> Adam Weinberger <adamw at magnesium.net> wrote:
>
>> Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous
>> that
>> I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my
>> system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it
>> to
>> remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support
>> linuxpluginwrapper.
>>
>> This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who
>> don't
>> wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time.
>>
>> # Adam
>
> Hmmm, who wants to remove it? I think many people are still using it
> (myself included)!
>
> I second Adam's plea; don't remove it!

I agree about to not remove it if this port is still function and work. If 
it's broke and nobody can fix it, then it's ok to remove it.

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list