www/flashpluginwrapper

Norikatsu Shigemura nork at FreeBSD.org
Wed Feb 18 05:58:07 PST 2004


On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500
Adam Weinberger <adamw at magnesium.net> wrote:
> Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous that
> I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my
> system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it to
> remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support
> linuxpluginwrapper.
> This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who don't
> wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time.

	I don't know why you said such a thing.  I see.  linimon@ was
	committed about it.  OK.

	I will not remove flashpluginwrapper.  But I think that anyone
	doesn't want to use this port.  Because it was upgrade to
	linuxpluginwrapper.  Of cause, I know many people who is using
	non-libmap.conf(5) feature's environment.  So I'm keeping it.

	In the current case, I was wrong to set IGNORE.  So I'll change
	like following lines.  Please wait (or Adam, you can commit by
	my approval).

	1. remove IGNORE, EXPIRATION_DATE.
	2. change MAINTAINER to ports at .
	3. replace pre-everything:: or DEPRECATED from IGNORE message.

	Is this OK?


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list