www/flashpluginwrapper
Norikatsu Shigemura
nork at FreeBSD.org
Wed Feb 18 05:58:07 PST 2004
On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500
Adam Weinberger <adamw at magnesium.net> wrote:
> Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous that
> I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my
> system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it to
> remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support
> linuxpluginwrapper.
> This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who don't
> wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time.
I don't know why you said such a thing. I see. linimon@ was
committed about it. OK.
I will not remove flashpluginwrapper. But I think that anyone
doesn't want to use this port. Because it was upgrade to
linuxpluginwrapper. Of cause, I know many people who is using
non-libmap.conf(5) feature's environment. So I'm keeping it.
In the current case, I was wrong to set IGNORE. So I'll change
like following lines. Please wait (or Adam, you can commit by
my approval).
1. remove IGNORE, EXPIRATION_DATE.
2. change MAINTAINER to ports at .
3. replace pre-everything:: or DEPRECATED from IGNORE message.
Is this OK?
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list