ghostscript-afpl vs ghostscript-gnu
kris at obsecurity.org
Sun Feb 15 13:39:03 PST 2004
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > Eww, how did this superfluous variable get into bsd.port.mk? You're
> > supposed to use GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT to specify which of the n ghostscript
> > ports you want to use.
> As ports/36112, which was originally someone else's PR, but one
> on which you had commented "this patch needs to be reworked for
> the current bsd.port.mk" which I then did. See audit log for
> details. You've got my permission to change it if you hate it.
It looks like the WITH_cruft appeared in the audit trail at a later
point. Actually I think some of my responses to Jens were not
recorded in the audit trail either.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040215/fbf8a28a/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports