ghostscript-afpl vs ghostscript-gnu

Kris Kennaway kris at
Sun Feb 15 13:39:03 PST 2004

On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > Eww, how did this superfluous variable get into  You're
> > supposed to use GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT to specify which of the n ghostscript
> > ports you want to use.
> As ports/36112, which was originally someone else's PR, but one
> on which you had commented "this patch needs to be reworked for
> the current" which I then did.  See audit log for
> details.  You've got my permission to change it if you hate it.

It looks like the WITH_cruft appeared in the audit trail at a later
point.  Actually I think some of my responses to Jens were not
recorded in the audit trail either.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list