Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS
kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Feb 14 16:12:56 PST 2004
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 04:02:11PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Or just add NO_LATEST_LINK, because people aren't as likely to guess
> > any name that isn't the name of the port, when they do pkg_add -r.
> That would be fine too. If you want, I'll go ahead and commit
> NO_LATEST_LINK to these ports.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040214/40b43b25/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports