Suggestion for distinction of XS Perl ports
apeiron at comcast.net
Fri Feb 6 15:53:46 PST 2004
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 16:52:44 EST, parv scribbled these
> I did not want to explicitly say that adding 'XS' to a Perl module
> port's name for the sole reason to make it easy for one person to
> upgrade was silly.
> See also...
Okay, that makes sense.
> That seems a better/cleaner idea than to put XS in a port's
> directory name.
Agreed. I'd personally like to see something like this, and wouldn't
mind maintaining it either. For someone like me (who has close to a
hundred Perl modules installed), it can be a great time saver,
especially on a low-resource machine.
I'd also like to receive more comments about this -- if it is to make
it into FreeBSD, I want it to work as well as possible.
I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded
pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson
Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040206/13cc26c3/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports