distfile for lang/ifc

NAKATA Maho chat95 at mac.com
Thu Dec 16 23:27:39 PST 2004


In Message-ID: <41B8DCD3.1080009 at math.missouri.edu> 
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen at math.missouri.edu> wrote:

Dear Stephen
How are you doing?

> 1.  Is it likely that lang/ifc will be updated soon?
Yes. updated today.

> 2.  Or is it possible to get hold of l_fc_pc_8.0.046.tar.gz and 
> l_fc_pc_8.0.046_pe050.1.tar.gz from somewhere, and if so, will the 
> non-commercial license that Intel sent me still work on this older version?

Go to https://premier.intel.com/
you must be a resgtered user (no fee)

> 3.  Or if I were to try to update the port myself, would a simple 
> substitution of distfiles and a few other things in the Makefile do the job?

Might be.

> I did a search on the mailing list of ports, and I saw some kind of 
> discussion - maybe lseek doesn't work quite right or something.  But my 
lseek issue was fixed by myself before.

> applications will be doing numerical calculations, and so if an lseek 
> here or there doesn't work quite right, I can live with this.  Anyway, 
> all this discussion seemed to take place in April or May, and I wonder 
> if people are still thinking about it?

So, no :)

> P.S. The lang/icc port seems to work great, and for computationally 
> intensive calculations seems to be faster than the gcc that comes with 
> FreeBSD 5.3.

This is not my port :) but I think netchild is wonderful committer.

Thank you very much for your e-mail and suggestion.
-- NAKATA, Maho






More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list