sysutils/bpm fails to notice that portupgrade is already
adamw at FreeBSD.org
Fri Aug 27 11:22:38 PDT 2004
>> (08.27.2004 @ 1047 PST): Oliver Eikemeier said, in 0.7K: <<
> Dan Langille wrote:
> >On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> >>Dan Langille wrote:
> >>>[root at laptop:/usr/ports/sysutils/bpm] # make install clean
> >>>===> Installing for bpm-0.4.1b
> >>>===> bpm-0.4.1b depends on executable: portupgrade - not found
> >>Fo course your $PATH would be interesting at that point...
> >[dan at laptop:~] $ echo $PATH
> >[dan at laptop:~] $
> /usr/share/skel/dot.profile has
> so I would check your ~/.profile in this case.
>> end of "Re: sysutils/bpm fails to notice that portupgrade is already installed" from Oliver Eikemeier <<
So is this a local problem for Dan, do you think, or would it be in
everyone's best interest to change bpm's portupgrade dependency?
adamw at magnesium.net || adamw at FreeBSD.org
adamw at vectors.cx || adamw at gnome.org
More information about the freebsd-ports