postfix port version numbering -- suggestions wanted
jtrigg at spamcop.net
Wed Apr 28 12:13:20 PDT 2004
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:20:05PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> During the freeze, postfix 2.1 was released, and postfix 2.2
> "development" branch was started. It is fairly self-evident that the
> postfix-current port should become the 2.2 version. What is not clear
> is how to handle the transition from the 2.0 to 2.1 as the "release"
> Currently there are three postfix ports: postfix1, postfix, and
> postfix-current. Obviously, enough people still run postfix 1.x to
> need a postfix1 port. So my thought is to make a postfix20 port for
> the now old 2.0 line, and have the postfix port be the 2.1 release.
> This way people can upgrade as they see fit, and if they have a burning
> desire to still run 2.0.x, they can. Or is there any point in having a
> 2.0 sitting about? They're totally backward compatible.
> What do other postfix users out there think? I'm holding off
> submitting the PR's until we decide on what to do.
> Please follow up to the list. I read it.
I don't think it's necessary. There isn't a large effort involved in
moving from 2.0.x to 2.1 the way there is in moving from 1.x to 2.x.
Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website X HELP CURE HTML MAIL
Verger, All Saints Church - Sharon Chapel / \
More information about the freebsd-ports