I have patches of update and few new ports of ruby-gnome2-all
knu at iDaemons.org
Tue Apr 6 00:37:20 PDT 2004
At Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:20:32 -0500,
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> I have updated ruby-gnome2-all (around 11 ports) 0.8.0 -> 0.9.1 and
> around four new ports such as ruby-gtkhtml, ruby-atk and etc. I have
> put your email in the MAINTAINER in those new ports if it's ok with
> you? Those new ports are came from the same tarball of
> ruby-gnome2-all. I have tested almost all of examples and they work
Nice to hear that. I spent a bit of time trying to update it but
couldn't work out due to lack of time and vitality. If you have them,
because you seem to, please take over the maintainership of those
> great. Only one ruby-gst is going to be mark broken and disable in the
> ruby-gnome2-all, because it will not compile with the new gstreamer
> 0.8 API/ABI.
I guess this will be coped with in no distant future. You can leave
the ruby-gst port broken for a while.
> How would like you me to do with the PR? Seperate them like a PR of
> diff file to update 0.9.1 and each PRs of new port? Or, put all of
> them together in a PR? If I do the seperate, then you will have to
> commit the new ports at the same time with update 0.9.1 to make
> ruby-gtk2 works since it needs new ruby-atk port.
You can arrange the patches in one PR. I'll take care of it.
> BTW: I still need to finish three more new ports, which they should be
> finish by tonight or tomorrow.
Great. Please Cc: me when you submit a PR. Thanks!
/__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
"It seems to me as we make our own few circles 'round the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one"
More information about the freebsd-ports