Bricolage + mod_perl. Comments welcomed.

[Andy Harrison]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 11-Sep-2003, Mathieu Arnold wrote message "Re: Bricolage + mod_perl.
Comments welcomed."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>| I was thinking of creating something like the www/apache13-ssl port
>| and name it apache13-mod_perl. Is this the appropiate way to solve
>| the problem? Does anyone know of any other ports or programs that
>| might benefit (or need) a statically compiled version of
>| mod_perl+apache.
>| 
>| Any comments or suggestions, especially by committers, are welcome. 
> 
> Why does it need mod_perl statically linked into apache ?
> There are known leaks with it as a dso, but it does not harm to have it
> that way.

I installed bricolage once to give it a try.  IIRC, they cited stability issues
as their reasons, I don't recall the specifics.  So I just edited the script so
it wouldn't detect for mod_perl anymore and installed bricolage that way.



~~ 
Andy Harrison
(full headers for details)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQCVAwUBP2DPoVPEkLgodAWVAQHY1QP/ZUBBHZUFiDOivmpSjh9Venacpczn/5Qc
et5dF5BU4HRLxyWspSu/v6HZ9t42WzoTLS6uCQnymQPEedKenFFVzsmG9F3DkI3P
Y4m/hvmgJr5quMg9zupj5enu+0Rkv+lESaorSquVyV+gdcoM73bXESxzJ7XVbBdL
8U3QyMwmowI=
=JhQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----