pam_krb5 port question

Lewis Thompson purple at
Mon Sep 8 17:41:50 PDT 2003

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:07:17AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Jon Passki wrote:
> >Is there any reason why the port is mainly focused for MIT Kerberos
> >and not Heimdal?
> KRB5_IMPL=heimdail didn't help? If so, it'll be great if you fix this 
> and send a patch to the port maintainer.

I'm personally not skilled enough to do it (well, not skilled... I just
wouldn't know how) but I'd really like to see this use the Heimdal
Kerberos provided in the base system.


I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.  --Bob Dylan, 1964.
-| msn:purple at | jab:lewiz at | url: |-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list