General linux_base issue
Thomas E. Zander
riggs at rrr.de
Fri Oct 10 14:47:00 PDT 2003
I don't know if this topic has already been discussed. If so, I apology
for this mail (which is kind of irrelevant in this case).
I'd suggest that we should try to make linux_base-debian the default
I have two main reasons for this suggestion:
- RedHat has developed some kind of strange product development
philosophy in the last years. I've been using RedHat since 5.2 and
actually I don't see that this distribution has ever evolved to a
state which could be described as "technically clean".
But the point is: The actual "Red Hat Linux" distribution is no
longer free. So sooner or later the port must me changed into
"linux_base-fedora" if we want to have a recent linux base system.
I think debian is the technically cleaner version, there is a huge
package repository, so why not?!
- Debian has longer lifetime cycles. Seriously, RedHat, SuSE and some
others throw 3 revisions of their os versions in the world in only
one year. The debian guys takes some time until a new version is
released, so the effort to keep the linux_base up to date to existing
linux distributions is significantly lower.
So, isn't this an idea worth a try for 5.2-R?
WHat do you think?
- "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and
-- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin.
--- And what happened?" pressed Ford.
---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20031010/e0a87712/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports