ports/foo/nut conflict ?
Kirill Ponomarew
ponomarew at oberon.net
Wed Jul 9 13:55:39 PDT 2003
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:59:02PM +0800, Morton Lin wrote:
> Hi, Sir :
>
> There were two named "nut" ports in the ports tree.
>
> 1) ports/misc/nut/
> (from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html I saw
> its name should be "health-nut-8.8" or something
> like that ? )
It can be renamed to health-nut, it's ok from me ;-)
> 2) ports/sysutils/nut/
-Kirill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20030709/669f5cab/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list