Apache dependence
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Aug 18 13:30:22 PDT 2003
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:53:57PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:19:37AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> >
> >>How people decide the problem with ports depended on Apache?
> >>It is known there is a few apache ports, how to decide what port to
> >>depend on?
> >
> >
> >See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/32604
> >The patch needs to be updated to use APACHE_PORT instead.
>
> But how is it works? Where APACHE_PORT is set? There is no such variable
> in Mk/bsd.*.mk.
> I've seen no patch where you point.
The PR proposes to use AP_PORT to hold the category/portname of the
default apache port to use. As discussed in the audit trail of the
PR, the variable should be named APACHE_PORT instead.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20030818/e30ee00b/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list