the future of xemacs21

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:50:55AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Hello Porters,
> 
> xemacs-devel was just repo copied to xemacs to track the stable branch
> of Xemacs.
> 
> The question now is, what do we do with xemacs21? xemacs-21.1.14,
> which is what's in xemacs21, is now considered historical. But
> there are so many other ports which depend on xemacs21 that it may
> well be a good idea to keep xemacs21 around and create new ports
> to track xemacs.
> 
> So I'd like to get a consensus. Do we delete xemacs21 after all the
> ports which depend on it are updated to depend on xemacs? Or do we
> want to keep xemacs21 and add new ports to depend on the new xemacs?

Move over the ones that work and try to fix the others.  Once nothing
is left depending on xemacs21 it can be removed.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20030422/e8d082a5/attachment.bin