Does the libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 exists in the ports tree?

Brandon D. Valentine ports at geekpunk.net
Mon Apr 21 19:24:59 PDT 2003


On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 06:19:39PM -0500, Mezz bsdforums.org wrote:
> I seem to not able find libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 in the ports tree, but 
> only can find libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 (linked to 
> libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so) that came with the lastest linux_base. Just 
> asking, because linux-flash6 required the libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 to make 
> it works. So, I linked it libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 -> 
> libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so to get linux-flash6 works with the Opera.
> 
> Perhaps, either linux_base or linux-flash6 needs to update to get 
> linux-flash6 works?

I am away from my primary FreeBSD box at the moment and will be until
tomorrow but I will look into this tomorrow morning.  The linux_base
I've got installed on this laptop appears not to include a Linux ldd so
I'll have to do something about determining the actual shared library
dependencies recorded in the binary and figure out what our linux_base
currently does with the C++ libs.

Thanks for the heads up,

Brandon D. Valentine
-- 
brandon at dvalentine.com                                 http://www.geekpunk.net
Pseudo-Random Googlism:  brandon is situated very close to the geographical
                         centre of north america


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list