Recent bsd.port.mk changes

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Apr 21 16:17:22 PDT 2003


On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:12:38AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:

> >We should think about how to fix this so it is allowed.  Perhaps the
> >key is to compare the pkg-plist for the ports with the same origin to
> >see if any files conflict.
> 
> I see the problem. I guess we can check ports name too and so enable to 
> install them. I'll try it tomorrow.

Thanks!

> >There also appears to be a bug that is performing substring matches on
> >existing packages, somehow.
> >
> >http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-4-latest/kde-i18n-3.1.1.log
> >
> >kde-i18n-3.1.1 is not installed, but a lot of *-kde-i18n-3.1.1 ports
> 
> I don't understand a reason. All looks good. And I can't fully reproduce 
> it :(

I'm a little bit confused as well.  This did not appear in my 4-exp
testing because the kde-i18n-3.1.1 port was broken at the time.
Perhaps it is unrelated.  I'll try to look into it some more.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20030421/839298c9/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list