[Bug 256033] u-boot for nanopc-t4 (vendor)

bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Thu May 20 15:53:21 UTC 2021


https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256033

            Bug ID: 256033
           Summary: u-boot for nanopc-t4 (vendor)
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: arm64
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: bz at FreeBSD.org

Created attachment 225128
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=225128&action=edit
FriendlyARM github based u-boot and rkbin for nanopc-t4

I haven't had many blessings getitng my nanopc-t4 stable with a stock u-boot.

After more than a year I ended up and hacked up the vendor tree to compile on
FreeBSD and work mostly with my setup.
Seems it is very stable and memory issues are gone.

I am trying to jot more notes down on
   https://wiki.freebsd.org/BjoernZeeb/NanoPC-T4
in the next weeks as things progress and I find moments.

Meanwhile I wanted to put the (ugly) hacked up change here.
It could really need someone with a lot more ports clue than me to integrate
this into u-boot-master (which I mostly copied over) but not all.
If someone helps me to figure out the github vs. default distfetch stuff I am
willing to cleanup the build stuff (and probably also to significantly reduce
the patch size as gseq changes etc are not needed when done as a port).

It uses the (hacked up) vendor supplied make.sh currently to build and not the
normal build framework and uses rkbin (again from vendor).

If this mess is too much and people say stock u-boot support this then simply
close this but I did want it documented for anyone searching.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list