[Bug 238855] category/port: bootstrap-openjdk8 requires binary compatibility on 12.0-RELEASE

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238855

            Bug ID: 238855
           Summary: category/port: bootstrap-openjdk8 requires binary
                    compatibility on 12.0-RELEASE
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: chadf at triularity.org

On FreeBSD 12.0, without binary compatibility enabled, bootstrap-openjdk8 fails
when building openjdk8.

# /usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk8/bin/javac
Bad system call (core dumped)

# file /usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk8/bin/javac
/usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk8/bin/javac: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64,
version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, for
FreeBSD 10.3, FreeBSD-style, stripped

# uname -a
FreeBSD myhostname 12.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p6 MYKERNELNAME  amd64


This port requires appropriate COMPAT_FREEBSDxx kernel options for FreeBSD 12.0
(and 11.x, presumably). Perhaps it could check and give a noticeable warning if
not enabled in the running kernel. If currently undetectable, maybe sysctl
entries could be added to communicate such functionality (or lack of) to
userland, e.g. "compat.10x.enabled" (but adding such a feature is probably
beyond the scope of this bug report).


Note #1: ktrace shows the failing syscall for be one for compat11. This seemes
odd for a 10.3 binary. Maybe it is normal, but I thought it was worth
mentioning in case it was a symptom of a hidden problem. I also had to enable
COMPAT_FREEBSD11 in the kernel to get this port to work.

    . . .
  1067 javac    CALL  compat11.stat
  1067 javac    RET   compat11.stat -1 errno 78 Function not implemented
  1067 javac    PSIG  SIGSYS SIG_DFL code=SI_KERNEL
  1067 javac    NAMI  "javac.core"


Note #2: It does not appear to require the misc/compat10x port (when used to
build java/openjdk8).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.