[Bug 239887] graphics/luminance-qt5: Update to 2.6.0

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239887

--- Comment #5 from Hannes Hauswedell <h2+fbsdports at fsfe.org> ---
> - Include the patch files / directory removals in the svn / unified diff

Isn't that included? I removed the directory before creating the diff and the
diff says:

Only in luminance-qt5OLD: files

> - Create a separate issue for the port rename proposal (including patch)

Will do so once this is through.

> - Set the maintainer-approval Attachment flag to signify maintainer approval on patches for ports you maintain. Attachment -> Details -> maintainer-approval [+] (or set it during initial upload/attachment)

Done.

> - Confirm the patch/changes here pass QA (portlint, poudriere at least)

make describe passses.

portlint passes.

make check-plist passes.

make stage-qa detected missing dependency on openmp. I have updated the patch
for this. Now stage-qa passes.

port test gives me a lot of the following:

actual-package-depends: dependency on /usr/local/lib/libboost_date_time.so not
registered (normal if it belongs to base)

But the port has LIB_DEPENDS on libboost_date_time.so:devel/boost-libs (and
other respective ports).

I haven't worked with poudriere, yet, I thought that was for bulk building? Is
it required for all ports maintainers to install this nowadays? It looks
non-trivial to set up.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.