[Bug 227127] www/squid-devel: update to 4.0.24, add BDB option
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Fri Mar 30 22:25:12 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227127
Bug ID: 227127
Summary: www/squid-devel: update to 4.0.24, add BDB option
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: ncrogers at gmail.com
CC: timp87 at gmail.com
CC: timp87 at gmail.com
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(timp87 at gmail.com)
Created attachment 191994
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191994&action=edit
update to 4.0.24, add BDB option
This patch updates squid-devel to the latest version 4.0.24.
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-announce-Squid-4-0-24-beta-is-available-td4685043.html
I've also included an option to exclude Berkeley DB support, as my organization
has concerns over its license. bdb was recently added to USES in this commit:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=438126
The "BDB" option seems to follow the general ports convention of how bdb
support is included or not. Only the ext_session_acl and ext_time_quota_acl
require Berkeley DB support, so it seems safe to optionally exclude it. To be
consistent with the new behavior of this port I've enabled BDB by default.
Perhaps there is a more appropriate way to configure this?
I've also tried including support for the ext_session acl helper, which also
relies on BDB.
Thanks for your consideration.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list