[Bug 227127] www/squid-devel: update to 4.0.24, add BDB option

bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Fri Mar 30 22:25:12 UTC 2018


https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227127

            Bug ID: 227127
           Summary: www/squid-devel: update to 4.0.24, add BDB option
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: ncrogers at gmail.com
                CC: timp87 at gmail.com
                CC: timp87 at gmail.com
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(timp87 at gmail.com)

Created attachment 191994
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191994&action=edit
update to 4.0.24, add BDB option

This patch updates squid-devel to the latest version 4.0.24.

http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-announce-Squid-4-0-24-beta-is-available-td4685043.html

I've also included an option to exclude Berkeley DB support, as my organization
has concerns over its license. bdb was recently added to USES in this commit:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=438126

The "BDB" option seems to follow the general ports convention of how bdb
support is included or not. Only the ext_session_acl and ext_time_quota_acl
require Berkeley DB support, so it seems safe to optionally exclude it. To be
consistent with the new behavior of this port I've enabled BDB by default.
Perhaps there is a more appropriate way to configure this?

I've also tried including support for the ext_session acl helper, which also
relies on BDB.

Thanks for your consideration.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list