[Bug 229332] print/ghostscript9-agpl-base: opvp driver is missing
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon Jun 25 09:26:14 UTC 2018
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229332
Bug ID: 229332
Summary: print/ghostscript9-agpl-base: opvp driver is missing
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: doceng at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: omatsuda000 at gmail.com
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(doceng at FreeBSD.org)
Assignee: doceng at FreeBSD.org
The latest print/ghostscript9-agpl-base 9.23 doesn't include "opvp" driver,
which is a contributed one and, for example, used by some printer drivers such
as those for Canon printers. Though the port is designed to include all
contributed drivers, "configure" script omit opvp driver from generated
Makefile as recorded in config.log:
WARNING: Unable to include opvp/oprp driver due to missing or disabled
prerequisites...
I couldn't understand why this happens. In "configure" there is a part as
follows:
if test x$ac_cv_lib_dl_dlopen != xno -a x$found_iconv != xno; then
P_DEVS0="$P_DEVS0 $OPVP_DEVS"
else
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: WARNING: Unable to include
opvp/oprp driver due to missing or disabled prerequisites..." >&5
$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: Unable to include opvp/oprp driver due to missing
or disabled prerequisites..." >&2;}
fi
But this part is exacly the same as those for ghostscript9-agpl-base 9.16 which
successfully includes the opvp driver.
A bruteforce workaround is to modify Makefile by hand as follows:
cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9-agpl-base
make configure
cd work/ghostscript9-agpl-base
vi Makefile
: add the followin line
: DEVICE_DEVS8=$(DD)oprp.dev $(DD)opvp.dev
cd ../..
make
But obviously it cannot be a permanent solution...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list