[Bug 216542] sysutils/duplicity Python segfaults, related to librsync 2.0.0?
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sat Jan 28 10:29:08 UTC 2017
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216542
Bug ID: 216542
Summary: sysutils/duplicity Python segfaults, related to
librsync 2.0.0?
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: freebsdbugs at filis.org
After we upgraded a couple of boxes to duplicity with the new librsync2
dependency, Python starts segfaulting, when there are backup sets in place. So
we started new chains yesterday and today's backup scripts let Python segfault
again. I searched around a bit and it seems, someone already filed an issue
related to librsync2 here
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/284756
that links to this librsync2 PR
https://github.com/librsync/librsync/issues/50#issuecomment-183803254
and this relates to what we got in the core dump:
...
#0 0x0000000805c7f7df in rs_search_for_block () from
/usr/local/lib/librsync.so.2
[New Thread 8086e5c00 (LWP 100222/<unknown>)]
[New Thread 8084f3000 (LWP 100418/<unknown>)]
[New Thread 802006400 (LWP 101415/<unknown>)]
So could we maybe go back to librsync1 until this is fixed in librsync 2.0.1 or
import the patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list