[Bug 218843] add WTFPL license to ports tree
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Wed Apr 26 20:27:19 UTC 2017
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218843
Dave Cottlehuber <dch at skunkwerks.at> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #182065|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #182065|maintainer-approval? |
Flags| |
Attachment #182111| |maintainer-approval?
Flags| |
--- Comment #6 from Dave Cottlehuber <dch at skunkwerks.at> ---
Created attachment 182111
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=182111&action=edit
v3 patch fix incorrect usage of _LICENSE_GROUPS and use _LICENSE_PERMS_DEFAULT
mat@ I understand your point, for example the APACHE20 license
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html has a template at the bottom
of the page, for applying the license to your own work.
However in the case of the WTFPL2 the line:
>+ Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam at hocevar.net>
Is *not* the copyright of the whole work, but specifically the copyright of the
license itself, and therefore belongs with the license.
For example we already have PHP301 with a similar line:
> Copyright (c) 1999 - 2010 The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
I revised the patch to fall through to use _LICENSE_PERMS_DEFAULT
_LICENSE_PERMS_DEFAULT=>dist-mirror dist-sell pkg-mirror pkg-sell auto-accept
I think this addresses the open concerns.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list