[Bug 211094] net/opensips: Update to 2.1.3

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211094

            Bug ID: 211094
           Summary: net/opensips: Update to 2.1.3
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: euan at potensol.com

Created attachment 172480
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=172480&action=edit
Diff patch between current port version and upgrade to v2.1.3

Update to version 2.1.3. The reason I'm not going to 2.2.0 (the latest and
newly released LTS) is for the following reasons:

- Stability: my experience with OpenSIPS on FreeBSD (perhaps just in jails) is
that it can be unstable on certain versions and/or configurations. Stability is
most important to me. Version 2.1.3 is just a bug fix release over the
currently ported 2.1.2. Once the new LTS version matures (2.2.1 or 2.2.2) I'll
switch to it.

- Development time: I don't have too much time at the moment to develop the
port for any new features or other changes in a new major point release. Since
the OpenSIPS port is quite a difficult one to develop (no autotools or cmake),
it could take quite a big of R&D to get it right.

- Testing: I have not got the time at the moment to runtime test a new major
point release. By tracking the known to be stable 2.1.x branch, it buys me time
to develop and test the new 2.2.x (LTS branch) once I get some more time.

The changes in this update were mostly rudimentary. I did have to fix some
issues raised by DEVELOPER=yes, mostly missing LIB_DEPENDS.

NOTE: I'm not sure why I need USES+=ssl when TLS option is not selected, but I
added it anyway to keep DEVELOPER=yes happy.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.