[Bug 203220] security/cracklib: 3rd largest port, request to package sources
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun Sep 20 10:01:18 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203220
Bug ID: 203220
Summary: security/cracklib: 3rd largest port, request to
package sources
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: cy at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: marino at FreeBSD.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(cy at FreeBSD.org)
Assignee: cy at FreeBSD.org
security/cracklib is the 3rd largest port by source size. If you discount
absurdly huge pkg-plist files and vuxml (which is a special case), you can
consider it the largest port in the collection:
Combined size of ports: 369.4 Mb
The Top 20 ports by size account for 8.48% of the collection
=======================================================================
0.24% 0.88Mb lang/mlton
0.25% 0.93Mb lang/ruby21
0.26% 0.95Mb lang/ruby20
0.26% 0.97Mb sysutils/webmin
0.27% 0.98Mb net/remmina
0.27% 1.01Mb lang/ruby22
0.29% 1.07Mb math/scilab
0.30% 1.12Mb www/extjs
0.32% 1.18Mb devel/boost-docs
0.34% 1.27Mb cad/opencascade
0.36% 1.32Mb lang/racket
0.36% 1.33Mb java/openjdk8
0.38% 1.40Mb www/geneweb
0.39% 1.44Mb x11-themes/mate-icon-theme-faenza
0.42% 1.56Mb www/sakai
0.46% 1.69Mb print/texlive-docs
0.49% 1.80Mb java/openjdk7
0.50% 1.85Mb security/cracklib
1.00% 3.68Mb security/vuxml
1.32% 4.88Mb print/texlive-texmf
=======================================================================
8.48% 31.33Mb
I think these cracklib files could be easily compressed in a tarball and stored
in LOCAL/cy, and treated like a normal distfile right?
Can I request that this be done? I know you inherited it like this, but it was
wrong in the first place.
Thanks,
John
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list