[Bug 203220] security/cracklib: 3rd largest port, request to package sources

bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun Sep 20 10:01:18 UTC 2015


https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203220

            Bug ID: 203220
           Summary: security/cracklib: 3rd largest port, request to
                    package sources
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: cy at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: marino at FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(cy at FreeBSD.org)
          Assignee: cy at FreeBSD.org

security/cracklib is the 3rd largest port by source size.  If you discount
absurdly huge pkg-plist files and vuxml (which is a special case), you can
consider it the largest port in the collection:

Combined size of ports: 369.4 Mb
The Top 20 ports by size account for 8.48% of the collection
=======================================================================
 0.24%   0.88Mb  lang/mlton
 0.25%   0.93Mb  lang/ruby21
 0.26%   0.95Mb  lang/ruby20
 0.26%   0.97Mb  sysutils/webmin
 0.27%   0.98Mb  net/remmina
 0.27%   1.01Mb  lang/ruby22
 0.29%   1.07Mb  math/scilab
 0.30%   1.12Mb  www/extjs
 0.32%   1.18Mb  devel/boost-docs
 0.34%   1.27Mb  cad/opencascade
 0.36%   1.32Mb  lang/racket
 0.36%   1.33Mb  java/openjdk8
 0.38%   1.40Mb  www/geneweb
 0.39%   1.44Mb  x11-themes/mate-icon-theme-faenza
 0.42%   1.56Mb  www/sakai
 0.46%   1.69Mb  print/texlive-docs
 0.49%   1.80Mb  java/openjdk7
 0.50%   1.85Mb  security/cracklib
 1.00%   3.68Mb  security/vuxml
 1.32%   4.88Mb  print/texlive-texmf
=======================================================================
 8.48%  31.33Mb


I think these cracklib files could be easily compressed in a tarball and stored
in LOCAL/cy, and treated like a normal distfile right?

Can I request that this be done?  I know you inherited it like this, but it was
wrong in the first place.

Thanks,
John

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list