[Bug 195426] mail/pine-pgp-filters Makefile contains incomplete check for ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpg2

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195426

--- Comment #4 from Trond.Endrestol at ximalas.info ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #3)

Should we add OPTIONS* to the Makefile and let the user specify if
mail/pine-pgp-filters should depend on gnupg2, gnupg1, or none of the above,
with the latter being the default?

I'm just thinking of the case where a particular user would like to build their
own packages, and simultaneously pick the correct dependency to automate the
installation of said ports/packages. I.e., if security/gnupg is missing, then
pkg would install that one as well while installing mail/pine-pgp-filters.

My initial motivation for the patch back in November, was that it's
counterproductive to depend on security/gnupg1, since I'm more into
security/gnupg than security/gnupg1. The OPTIONS* approach might be a flexible
solution, suitable for everyone.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.