[Bug 195024] [maintainer-update] net-mgmt/seafile: remove requirements of /proc
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Thu Nov 20 20:15:51 UTC 2014
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195024
--- Comment #12 from Jingfeng Yan <yan_jingfeng at yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jingfeng Yan from comment #9)
> > BTW, if the fuse discussion not fit here, you can send email to me yan_jingfeng at yahoo.com.
>
> It's fine here.
>
> > Do you mean DragonFly miss fuse kernel side support?
>
> Correct - no kernel support for FUSE
>
> > I thought I checked
> > roughly before, but not go to too much detail. FreeBSD and NetBSD, and
> > openBSD seems to fine. the founder of DragonFlyBSD started playing eithe
> > fuse-like idea in 2006. Could you give me some idea of why fuse is missing
> > there, what I can help to make this port happen on DragonFly?
>
> FUSE basically doesn't work that well. None of the FUSE ports are
> maintained (literally, they have no maintainer). It's unclear who is
> responsible for FUSE maintenance in the kernel. I think there's no
> designated person. Basically, it barely works on FreeBSD, when there is a
> problem nobody is there to fix it, and DragonFly just decided it wasn't
> worth pursuing. Maybe not officially, but nobody is making an effort to
> support it.
>
>
> > You are DPort creator, and active on DragonFly. If you can have some
> > evaluation, maybe we can have a way to make it work. At the same time, I
> > will check why we need fuse.
>
> I think the only hope is that FUSE is optional and that we don't set the
> option on DragonFly. If it's truly required, there's no hope.
>
> John
No, it is not required. It can be ignored. I will make FUSE to an option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list