[Bug 195788] New: [either pkg or port bug] linux-f10-flashplugin has problem with /compat being a symlink
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun Dec 7 21:38:00 UTC 2014
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195788
Bug ID: 195788
Summary: [either pkg or port bug] linux-f10-flashplugin has
problem with /compat being a symlink
Product: Ports Tree
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Infrastructure
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: avg at FreeBSD.org
hier(7) has the following information:
...
/compat/ normally a link to /usr/compat. If not, then the /usr/compat
comments apply
...
/usr/ contains the majority of user utilities and applications
...
compat/ files needed to support binary compatibility with
other operating systems, such as Linux
In my environment /compat is indeed a symlink to /usr/compat.
With 1.4.0.rc2 when doing pkg upgrade I get the following:
[322/394] Upgrading linux-f10-flashplugin from 11.2r202.418_2 to
11.2r202.418_4...
[322/394] Extracting linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.418_4: 100%
pkg: cannot rename //compat.8U70sa3Hubr4 to //compat: Not a directory
[322/394] Deleting files for linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.418_4: 100%
pkg: unlinkat(compat): Not a directory
zsh: exit 3
I must note that the (earlier version of the) package was installed when pkg
was at 1.3.8.
I see that the corresponding port has the following line in pkg-plist:
%NO_ALSA%@dir %COMPATDIR%
So, not sure if the problem is caused by the port or by pkg...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list