[Bug 195788] New: [either pkg or port bug] linux-f10-flashplugin has problem with /compat being a symlink

bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun Dec 7 21:38:00 UTC 2014


https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195788

            Bug ID: 195788
           Summary: [either pkg or port bug] linux-f10-flashplugin has
                    problem with /compat being a symlink
           Product: Ports Tree
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Infrastructure
          Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: avg at FreeBSD.org

hier(7) has the following information:
...
     /compat/   normally a link to /usr/compat.  If not, then the /usr/compat
                comments apply
...
     /usr/      contains the majority of user utilities and applications

...
                compat/   files needed to support binary compatibility with
                          other operating systems, such as Linux

In my environment /compat is indeed a symlink to /usr/compat.

With 1.4.0.rc2 when doing pkg upgrade I get the following:
[322/394] Upgrading linux-f10-flashplugin from 11.2r202.418_2 to
11.2r202.418_4...
[322/394] Extracting linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.418_4: 100%
pkg: cannot rename //compat.8U70sa3Hubr4 to //compat: Not a directory
[322/394] Deleting files for linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.418_4: 100%
pkg: unlinkat(compat): Not a directory
zsh: exit 3

I must note that the (earlier version of the) package was installed when pkg
was at 1.3.8.

I see that the corresponding port has the following line in pkg-plist:
%NO_ALSA%@dir %COMPATDIR%

So, not sure if the problem is caused by the port or by pkg...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list