ports/177577: print/freetype-tools and print/psutils-letter conflict

Don Lewis truckman at FreeBSD.org
Tue Apr 2 10:00:00 UTC 2013


>Number:         177577
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       print/freetype-tools and print/psutils-letter conflict
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Apr 02 10:00:00 UTC 2013
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Don Lewis
>Release:        FreeBSD 8.4-BETA1 i386
>Organization:
FreeBSD Project
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD scratch.catspoiler.org 8.4-BETA1 FreeBSD 8.4-BETA1 #57 r248721: Tue Mar 26 01:17:23 PDT 2013     root at scratch.catspoiler.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERICDDB  i386

	freetype-tools-1.3.1_9
	psutils-letter-1.17

>Description:
	The print/freetype-tools and print/psutils-letter ports
	both attempt to install /usr/local/bin/getafm.  If using pkgng
	this gets detected when the installation of the second of these
	two ports is registered, though this is too late becase the
	second port has already spammed the copy of getafm installed
	by the first port.

===>   Registering installation for psutils-letter-1.17_2^M
Installing psutils-letter-1.17_2...pkg: psutils-letter-1.17_2 conflicts with fre
etype-tools-1.3.1_9 (installs files into the same place).  Problematic file: /us
r/local/bin/getafm


>How-To-Repeat:
	Attempt to install both ports.

>Fix:

	At a minimum, the makefiles for these two ports should flag
	them as conflicting.

	It would be better to actually fix the conflict so that both
	ports can be installed on the same system.

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list