ports/166655: [MAINTAINER] www/gist: Fix distinfo

[Lung-Pin Chang]

Hi,

Sorry about my misunderstanding to the problem, the distinfo in
ports/166640 is correct.

It turned out to be that the distinfo I submitted in ports/166640 was
not commited with the Makefile change,

so after I did a portsnap and tried to install the port, it complained
about checksum error on the distfile.

This made me thought that I submitted distinfo for error version of
gist and that's why I decided to resubmit a version with correct
distinfo.


Currently there is no difference between using the tarball or fetch
the raw script from github since the content is identical,

but I'm going to install manpage for this script, (which I forgot to
submit with ports/166655) so using the tarball would be required in
the next few revisions.

Thanks!

2012/4/6  <scheidell at freebsd.org>:
> Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] www/gist: Fix distinfo
>
> State-Changed-From-To: closed->feedback
> State-Changed-By: scheidell
> State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 5 19:41:49 UTC 2012
> State-Changed-Why:
> Reopening:
> A question has been raised about the 40x size increase in the distfile over the previous version.  You send in this pr since
> the distinfo file was broken, right?  Can you tell me how big the distfile was before the distinfo file was broken? and if
> possible, how was it broken? was it upstream?
> Can you outline, maybe what the changes were that caused this 40x increase in size of the distfile?
>
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166655
>



-- 
Lung-Pin Chang 張瓏繽

Wireless Internet Laboratory & Computer Center
Department of Computer Science
National Chiao Tung University