ports/161225: security/pam_fprint: Updates to the last git version

[Zhihao Yuan]

On Nov 28, 2011 6:01 AM, "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> maybe mark BROKEN, not IGNORE?

This won't be fixed, since it's not a problem. So just keep it IGNORE.

>
> can I include   BROKEN in pam_fprint and fprint_demo if osversin < 800069?
>
> On 11/28/11 6:43 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>
>>
>> The problem has been discussed here
www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224 <
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224>
>>
>>
>> The thing is, we need libusb-1.0, what you referred in ports is 0.1x
>>
> I guess I am confused somewhat.  its got me running in circles.
>
> libfprint only needs libusb on fbsd 7.x, right?

It needs libusb-1.0, but the libusb in ports for stable/7 is libusb-0.1!

> .if ${OSVERSION} < 800069
> IGNORE=         libusb-1.0 is not avaible on FreeBSD < 8
> .else
> CONFIGURE_ENV+= LIBUSB_CFLAGS=" " LIBUSB_LIBS="-lusb"
> .endif
>
>
> but in libusb, I see:
>
> .if ${OSVERSION} >= 800069
> IGNORE=         has been already included into base system
> .endif
>
>
> should not the logic be, osversion < 80069 to include as a dependency
libusb?
>
> or do we mark libfprint, and the two fprint programs BROKEN if osversion
< 800069?
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> o: 561-999-5000
> d: 561-948-2259
> >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
>
>   * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
>   * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
>   * Hot Company Finalist 2011
>   * Best Email Security Product
>   * Certified SNORT Integrator
>