ports/118808: Fix to build ports/lang/drscheme on FreeBSD-7.0

Pav Lucistnik pav at FreeBSD.org
Thu Jun 19 03:45:43 UTC 2008


Andrew Reilly píše v čt 19. 06. 2008 v 13:16 +1000:
> Hi Pav,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 02:50:55AM +0000, pav at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> > Synopsis: Fix to build ports/lang/drscheme on FreeBSD-7.0
> > 
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: pav
> > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 19 02:50:30 UTC 2008
> > State-Changed-Why: 
> > Committed, thanks!
> > 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118808
> 
> I'm not sure that these patches are still necessary.  As far as
> I know, they've been accepted up-stream at least for version
> 372.

The port is still at 370. If you want to update the port, that would be
nice.

> Regarding 4.0, which has just been relased, I sent a new port
> for consideration to jkoshy a couple of days ago, but hadn't
> noticed that he's not the official maintainer any more.  Should
> I attach it to a send-pr, or send it to someone particular
> instead?  I opted to make it a new port (called plt-scheme,
> rather than drscheme) because it is not backwards compatible
> in some ways, and because the version number got smaller
> 4.0, rather than 400, and because that's what the PLT group
> themselves seem to be calling it, now.

send-pr sounds good.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>
Sun couldn't care less about Linux other than it now being necessary in
order to be buzzword compliant. -- Al Dente
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Toto je digit?ln? podepsan? ??st zpr?vy
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20080619/b52467b5/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list