ports/97880: net/boinc-client seems to have a dependency on astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced

Bruce Burden brucegb at bga.com
Thu May 25 05:00:33 UTC 2006


>Number:         97880
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       net/boinc-client seems to have a dependency on astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu May 25 05:00:31 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Bruce Burden
>Release:        6.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD tigerfish2.my.domain 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #2: Fri May 19 23:32:26 CDT 2006     brucegb at tigerfish2.my.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TIGERFISH2  i386
>Description:
boinc-setiathome-enhanced-5.12 will not recieve any work units if it is build after boinc-client-5.4.9.

I do not know why this is, but it has been my experience with two portupgrade -aruv on two different machines that I had to deinstall boinc-client and rebuild it it I wanted to received work units from setiathome.

My suspicion is that there is some information in the .xml files that boinc-client needs to provide to setiathome that is not present until boinc-setiathome-enhanced-5.12 is installed.

According to my typescript file, boinc-client is evaluated at line #6426 of 7051, boinc-setiathome-enhanced is evaluated at line #6436 of 7051. However, I believe it is a bad idea to make boinc-client dependent on boinc-setiathome, since boinc-client has to consider other boinc projects. Plus it should evaluate all needed info when it is executed, not when it is installed.
>How-To-Repeat:
Not confirmend, but I would attempt to build boinc-client, then boinc-setiathome-enhanced and see if it will recieve packets from setiathome.

Interesting test would be to attempt this with einstein, but I am not a member of that project.
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list