ports/92037: wrong report of package origin change.

[Tsurutani Naoki]

>Number:         92037
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       wrong report of package origin change.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jan 20 04:50:04 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Tsurutani Naoki
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD polymer3.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #16: Wed Jan 18 18:03:11 JST 2006 turutani at polymer3.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp:/usr/local/work/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POLYMER i386


	
>Description:
	running "portupgrade -aFO" reports the following messages:
	** Package origin of 'libnet' has been changed: 'net/libnet' -> 'net/libnet10'
	** Detected a package name change: libnet (net/libnet) -> 'libnet10' (net/libnet10)
	** No need to upgrade 'libnet-1.1.2.1,1' (>= libnet10-1.0.2a_1,1). (specify -f to force)

	I have installed libnet recently, but the message says that I am using
	libnet with old origin.

	This is caused by reading "MOVED" file, i guess.
	And now, the ports scheme allows the re-use of port name, so treating
	entries in MOVED file to all the port is not a right way.
	On the other hand, ignoring MOVED file is also not good, for it has many
	important informations. I want it be treated in the way like previous 
	version of portupgrade did.
	
>How-To-Repeat:
	% portupgrade -aFO
	
>Fix:
	return to the previous version.
	


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: