ports/91711: Shouldn't ports/x11-toolkit/freeglut get moved to ports/graphics?

[Sangwoo Shim]

>Number:         91711
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Shouldn't ports/x11-toolkit/freeglut get moved to ports/graphics?
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Jan 12 16:00:19 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Sangwoo Shim
>Release:        FreeBSD 7-CURRENT
>Organization:
Seoul Natl' Univ.
>Environment:
FreeBSD ssw.dyndns.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Dec 22 04:15:40 KST 2005     root at ssw.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SSW  amd64
>Description:
              As far as I know, both graphics/libglut and x11-toolkit/freeglut give same
API (library). Then why should they lie in the different categories?
I think freeglut should be moved to ports/graphics also, and marked as
conflict against graphics/libglut to avoid confusions.

>How-To-Repeat:
              
>Fix:
              
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: