ports/102292: btraceback shouldn't be disabled in bacula-server

[Dan Langille]

The following reply was made to PR ports/102292; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Dan Langille" <dan at langille.org>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc: Jo Rhett <jrhett at svcolo.com>
Subject: Re: ports/102292: btraceback shouldn't be disabled in bacula-server
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:08:23 -0400

 On 19 Aug 2006 at 18:40, Jo Rhett wrote:
 
 > Ugh.  A patch of a patch looks horrible, don't it?
 > 
 > Nutshell -- leave the btraceback lines in place.  Don't remove them.
 > 
 > Here's another attempt, but this is fugly ain't it?
 
 Still not good here:
 
 $ patch < ../patch
 Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
 (Patch is indented 1 space.)
 The text leading up to this was:
 --------------------------
 | --- files/patch-scripts-Makefile.in_orig        Sat Aug 19 14:04:09 
 2006
 | +++ files/patch-scripts-Makefile.in     Sat Aug 19 18:37:58 2006
 --------------------------
 Patching file files/patch-scripts-Makefile.in using Plan A...
 Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 2.
 patch: **** malformed patch at line 15: ${DESTDIR}${scriptdir}/mtx-
 changer.old; \
 [dan at polo:~/src/bacula-server] $
 
 
 -- 
 Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
 my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php